Commission of Advisers and Achievement of Execution
| Origin |
| Purposes |
| To establish an advising team to investigate and guide in local areas, to offer consulting services and policy guidance for projects applied by local governments; to achieve the expected goals of creating new features in urban and rural areas. |
| Background Analysis |
| The key points of impact on follow-up planning: |
| (1) |
Minor projects proposed by local governments generally lack of native humanism, property, and natural characteristics. |
| (2) |
Some of minor projects follow construction-oriented concepts and lack of insight of creation, progress, humanistic care and everlasting management. |
| (3) |
Executive teams are self-centered, and on the other hand, governments are not qualified to integrate the project. Therefore, it is difficult to cooperate and improve our environment. |
| (4) |
We need to establish follow-up procedures of evaluation because it is beneficial to reconstruct new style and features in local areas. Moreover, it efficiently helps to integrate planning, design, construction and management. | |
| Project Goals |
| (1) |
To help cities and towns (demonstrative towns) to cooperate with superior authorities for entire projects and everlasting management; to modify aspects for continuous promotion in the future |
| (2) |
To help major benchmark projects and executive teams for technical integration during the developing period; to guide working projects, contents or methods; to offer professional and technical consultation. |
| (3) |
To help CPAMI examine the execution of minor projects in local areas, and to select outstanding minor projects for continuous support and subsidization in the next year. | |
| Concepts of Execution |
| Key Points of the Executive Strategy |
| (1) |
To set up the operating system for project management. |
| (2) |
To hold technical workshops and practical seminars. |
| (3) |
To distinguish different guiding strategies for superior and improving cities and counties. |
| (4) |
To collect and edit “before and after” features of reconstruction for cities and towns. | |
| Procedure and Executive Contents |
| (1) |
Policy and Change of Approval Projects. |
| (2) |
Qualification of the Executive Team. |
| (3) |
Planning, Cooperation and Negotiation. |
| (4) |
Contents and Achievement. |
| (5) |
Comprehensive Conclusion | |
|
|
| The executive procedures of guidance and examination are as following |
|
CPAMI authorizes Association of Architecture. |
|
|
Set up organizations and work for consulting commissions. |
|
|
Subsidized executors superintend checking procedures and examination by consulting commissions. |
|
|
Mid-term presentation and examination. |
|
|
A: Planning design. |
|
B: Planning design with construction. |
|
| Principles of cases: |
| ‧ |
blueprints of demonstrative projects. |
| ‧ |
sampling examination of other subsidized projects. | |
|
| Principles of cases: |
| ‧ |
Examine blueprints of demonstrative projects before public construction bidding. |
| ‧ |
Collecting documentary films and photos of before, middle, and after construction is expected. |
| ‧ |
Practical expenditure of subsidization. | |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| Commission and examination |
| ‧ |
The city/county coordinator is able to invite 3-4 experts for examinatio |
| ‧ |
The coordinator is allowed to invite members of commission for examination if necessary |
| ‧ |
The priority is to invite conveners from the local associations of architecture |
| ‧ |
Inform CPAMI executive departments about the date, time and location of examination |
| ‧ |
The leaders, authorized architects, consulting companies are all expected to attend |
| ‧ |
Examine in the site if necessary |
| Contents of examination and conclusion |
| ‧ |
Relation of executive achievement and original planning. |
| ‧ |
According to the spirit of subsidization in the project. |
| ‧ |
Re-examine a month later if the achievement is not expected;appropriate funds after passing re-examination. |
| ‧ |
If the executive goals of the planning do not follow up well as expected,the subsidization will be stopped in the next year. |
| ‧ |
Oppositely, the potential project has a top priority be subsidized in the next year. | |
|
City/county coordinator complete mid-term report by June 30 |
|
| Mid-term examination report by groups |
| ‧ |
General comments and conclusion of mid-term examination report need to be integrated as computerized files by noon on July 16. |
| ‧ |
The file is required to present with provided examination forms. | |
| report of guidance and examination |
| 1. Guiding conclusion: |
| ‧ |
Approved: recommend to appropriate final funds. |
| ‧ |
Approved after re-examination by May 30: recommend to appropriate. |
| ‧ |
Approved after re-examination with a checking proposal: appropriate mid-term funds on June 30; disapproved after re-examination: deduct part of subsidization or stop the project and related funds in the next year. | |
| 2. The mid-term report needs to be completed by July 30, and the presentation will be arranged at the end of July or the middle of August. | |
| |
Re-review final examination, schedule and operating procedures according to mid-term executive results |
|
|
A: Planning design |
|
B: Planning design with construction |
|
| Principles of cases: |
| Complete final execution and guidance by September 15. | |
|
| Principles of cases: |
| Complete final execution and guidance by September 15. | |
|
| |
Complete final conclusion report of guidance and examination |
|
|
|
|